In my non expert opinion, advising people to consume B17 (cyanide after crushing it) and Mistletoe is extremely risky. They should consult a lawyer prior to publishing this. There are several other problems with this article but I do not want to lend credence to it by getting into arguments. I say this as someone that absolutely prefers natural and alternate methods of treatment.
Do you have a better resource or recommendations? I'd be happy to remove this from the internet. I feel that most other articles on the topic would be severely self-censored because of the small amount of research and the risk you mention, or just not interested in low-cost alternative treatments without a "medical" stamp on it. Research and reporting on low-cost treatment methods is probably underfunded.
So I am not a professional blogger, nor am I a lawyer but I would suggest providing references to not give the illusion that you came up with these ideas. You do have some references but I think you are missing some important ones and probably should drop one. There are researchers that get into some of the topics you mention and it may be worth referencing those researchers to reduce the risk from yourself and to give people a reference for something this significant and outside of standard of care. So basically just reference where you found the information.
I would entirely drop anything that involves potentially fatal treatments such as poisons (cyanide, mistletoe). I am aware of how it theoretically works but it is unlikely the average person will get this right and they only have to get it wrong once. In that they can literally only get it wrong once. I know chemo is also a poison but it is not self prescribed and the legal system accepts it as part of standard of care.
There are many YouTube videos with doctors talking about some of the alternative methods you mentioned such as FenBen I keep several bottles around just in case, the human version of Ivermectin but I would link to those videos by doctors and let them risk their license rather than you risking being sued by families. There are also doctors and nutritionists that talk about augmenting standard of care with fasting and specific diets and what results they have obtained with empirical data and observational or anecdotal data. Put the heat on them by referencing them and adding disclaimers on your site that you are not a doctor and this is not meant to be taken as medical advice. As a side note you may wish to research a bit more on what feeds cancer cells as it is a bit more nuanced and different than you describe. There are doctors and scientists that discuss this and the mitochondria metabolic issues and methyl shifts that lead to cancer but I will leave that research to you.
As one that rarely offers references it may seem hypocritical to suggest these things but in this case these tips can have a positive or negative impact on someone and if a person is lost to cancer their family will be looking for people to go after even if your advice is not really at fault. I would let medical groups handle that fallout as they have a lot of money and lawyers.
Other than those things I like the format and style of your blog as well as the intent. People should indeed have more options especially when the medical system gives up.
In my non expert opinion, advising people to consume B17 (cyanide after crushing it) and Mistletoe is extremely risky. They should consult a lawyer prior to publishing this. There are several other problems with this article but I do not want to lend credence to it by getting into arguments. I say this as someone that absolutely prefers natural and alternate methods of treatment.
Do you have a better resource or recommendations? I'd be happy to remove this from the internet. I feel that most other articles on the topic would be severely self-censored because of the small amount of research and the risk you mention, or just not interested in low-cost alternative treatments without a "medical" stamp on it. Research and reporting on low-cost treatment methods is probably underfunded.
So I am not a professional blogger, nor am I a lawyer but I would suggest providing references to not give the illusion that you came up with these ideas. You do have some references but I think you are missing some important ones and probably should drop one. There are researchers that get into some of the topics you mention and it may be worth referencing those researchers to reduce the risk from yourself and to give people a reference for something this significant and outside of standard of care. So basically just reference where you found the information.
I would entirely drop anything that involves potentially fatal treatments such as poisons (cyanide, mistletoe). I am aware of how it theoretically works but it is unlikely the average person will get this right and they only have to get it wrong once. In that they can literally only get it wrong once. I know chemo is also a poison but it is not self prescribed and the legal system accepts it as part of standard of care.
There are many YouTube videos with doctors talking about some of the alternative methods you mentioned such as FenBen I keep several bottles around just in case, the human version of Ivermectin but I would link to those videos by doctors and let them risk their license rather than you risking being sued by families. There are also doctors and nutritionists that talk about augmenting standard of care with fasting and specific diets and what results they have obtained with empirical data and observational or anecdotal data. Put the heat on them by referencing them and adding disclaimers on your site that you are not a doctor and this is not meant to be taken as medical advice. As a side note you may wish to research a bit more on what feeds cancer cells as it is a bit more nuanced and different than you describe. There are doctors and scientists that discuss this and the mitochondria metabolic issues and methyl shifts that lead to cancer but I will leave that research to you.
As one that rarely offers references it may seem hypocritical to suggest these things but in this case these tips can have a positive or negative impact on someone and if a person is lost to cancer their family will be looking for people to go after even if your advice is not really at fault. I would let medical groups handle that fallout as they have a lot of money and lawyers.
Other than those things I like the format and style of your blog as well as the intent. People should indeed have more options especially when the medical system gives up.
Thanks for taking the time to think about it - very helpful comments. Will check FenBen out and stick some references in as I find them again.